PUBLIC REPORT · SZCZECIN · VERSION 1.2

Remote visual assessment of roofs

Budziszyńska Street, Szczecin · addresses 47b, 47c, 48, 48a, 49, 49a, 49b, 49c and 49d

The Polish report is the source version. The English and German versions are informational translations.

Date
14 August 2026
Version
1.2
Report prepared by Aeronautiq Drone Solutions
AER · ROOF · 2026
Report prepared by Aeronautiq Drone Solutions

The German version is available as a complete web report and can be saved to PDF through the browser print function.

01

Executive summary

The material warrants urgent verification of F-01, assessment of pigeon-dropping contamination in stairwell 47b and of the two reported nesting locations at 48/48a, followed by an address-specific inspection of roofs, attics, passages between stairwells, drainage, chimneys, timber, windows and equipment.

Finding priorities

P1 · 1urgent verification within 1–3 working days
P2 · 9short-term inspection within 14 days
P3 · 2planning and documentation within 30–90 days

P1–P3 are internal recommendation priorities, not a statutory classification or safety determination.

02

Status, authorship and boundaries

Report prepared by Aeronautiq Drone Solutions. The photographic archive was supplied for analysis; the report does not state that Aeronautiq conducted the flight or captured the photographs.

This is remote visual documentation. It is not a building survey, structural assessment or statutory periodic inspection. Findings concern features visible in photographs from June 2026.

Some information about interiors comes from a resident report and was not independently verified. Assigning every photograph to an address requires a roof map and on-site inspection.

Evidence status

PHOTO
feature visible in a photograph; cause not established
RESIDENT REPORT
resident information not independently verified
DOCUMENT CHECK
requires plans, building records or inspection documents
ON-SITE VERIFIED
status reserved for a future update after inspection
03

Findings register F-01–F-12

Each finding is a question for direct verification, not a technical diagnosis. The complete report records the material, observation, possible significance, required verification, confidence and closure condition.

IDPriorityEvidenceIssue for verification
F-01P1PHOTO + RESIDENT REPORTOpening in a roof element visible as unclosed when photographed
F-02P2PHOTODeposits on the roof covering and moss-like accumulations
F-03P2PHOTOMaterial accumulation in drainage zones and at roof-plane junctions
F-04P2PHOTONon-uniform junction and visible repair material at a chimney base
F-05P2PHOTOSurface weathering of timber at eaves and gables
F-06P2PHOTOCables, lines, a corroded dish and equipment of unconfirmed function
F-07P2PHOTORoof windows and flashing zones requiring on-site inspection
F-08P3PHOTOTonal and textural differences in the roof covering
F-09P3DOCUMENT CHECKNo unambiguous assignment of every frame to an address and roof zone
F-10P2RESIDENT REPORTDroppings in stairwell 47b and two reported nesting locations at 48/48a
F-11P2RESIDENT REPORT + DOCUMENT CHECKWalled or partitioned passages between stairwells at attic level
F-12P2PHOTOFine cracks in the gable-wall render
Read the full descriptions and closure criteria
04

Recommended action plan

  1. 01
    1–3 working days

    Locate F-01, verify the current condition and protect the area if required.

  2. 02
    Within 14 days

    Inspect roofs, attics, drainage, chimneys, timber, windows, equipment and F-10–F-12 address by address.

  3. 03
    15–30 days

    Complete supplementary investigations and define cost, options and a programme of work.

  4. 04
    30–90 days

    Complete confirmed repairs, acceptance and before/after photographic records.

The property manager should be asked to acknowledge receipt, identify a coordinator, schedule every address and provide a result register and inspection records.

05

Photographic documentation

Only nine approved derivatives are published. They were cropped, rotated where required, resized and saved without EXIF/XMP/IPTC. No generative retouching was used.

Section of a pitched roof with many pale deposits and brown accumulations; timber elements and cables are visible near the gable.

Photograph 01Roof plane and gable zoneDJI_0260.JPG

Extensive deposits, moss-like accumulations, visible cables or lines and weathered timber.

What the image does not establish: Does not confirm the type of deposits, condition of cables or internal condition of the timber.

Related findings: F-02, F-05, F-06, F-08
Close view of two roof planes meeting; deposits, moss-like accumulations and a looped cable are visible near metal flashing.

Photograph 02Roof junction and drainage zoneDJI_0272.JPG

Organic material at a roof-plane junction and a cable or line of undetermined function.

What the image does not establish: Does not confirm a blockage or the function of the visible cable.

Related findings: F-02, F-03, F-06
Close view of a chimney on a pitched roof; metal flashings and a dark strip of sealing material are visible at its base.

Photograph 03Chimney and flashingsDJI_0289.JPG

A visible strip of repair or sealing material at the chimney base and deposits on the covering.

What the image does not establish: Does not confirm leakage or the condition of concealed layers.

Related findings: F-04
Roof with chimneys and antennas; one metal dish has extensive rust and pale deposits are visible on the covering.

Photograph 04Dish corrosion and roof equipmentDJI_0264.JPG

Extensive corrosion on one dish, deposits on the covering and chimney caps, and weathered timber.

What the image does not establish: Does not confirm anchorage condition or load-bearing capacity.

Related findings: F-02, F-05, F-06
Close view of the eaves with metal flashing, weathered boards and a cable forming a loose loop.

Photograph 05Eaves, timber and cableDJI_0306.JPG

A local discontinuity in an eaves board and a loosely routed cable.

What the image does not establish: Does not establish the depth of degradation or function of the cable.

Related findings: F-05, F-06
Building gable with grey boards; fine cracks are visible in the pale render below the gable.

Photograph 06Render cracks and gable zoneDJI_0381.JPG

Fine cracks in the render and surface weathering of timber.

What the image does not establish: Does not confirm structural damage, depth or activity of the cracks.

Related findings: F-05, F-12
Wide view of several roof planes with roof windows, chimneys, walkways and numerous pale and orange deposits.

Photograph 07Wide roof-plane viewDJI_0383.JPG

Extensive deposits and local differences in the appearance of the covering across several roof planes.

What the image does not establish: Does not establish the cause of the differences or the condition of window flashings.

Related findings: F-02, F-07, F-08
Close view of a rectangular opening in a roof element, partly covered by a displaced panel.

Photograph 08Opening and partly displaced panelDJI_0386.JPG

Rectangular opening with a panel partly above or beside it; the condition requires urgent verification.

What the image does not establish: Does not establish the opening's function, panel fixing or current condition.

Related findings: F-01
Section of a pitched roof at the eaves; leaves and dark material are visible in the gutter and several cables cross the roof.

Photograph 09Gutter and cables at the eavesDJI_0395.JPG

Material lying in the gutter and cables routed near the eaves.

What the image does not establish: Does not confirm a blockage or the function and termination of the cables.

Related findings: F-03, F-06
06

Privacy, rights and accessibility

Sources and version history

  • Archive supplied for analysis: 117 JPG files, 2 MP4 files and 8 SRT files.
  • Resident report dated 14 August 2026.
  • Version 1.2: PL/EN package, F-12, nine public photographs, manifest and complete HTML version.

SZCZECIN BASE · WORLDWIDE PROJECTS

Need similarly structured documentation?

Send the location, asset type, assessment objective and required format. Aeronautiq will review feasibility and propose a safe capture and reporting scope.

Operational base: Szczecin, Poland. We support projects worldwide; execution is confirmed after reviewing local regulations, airspace, permits, safety and logistics.

PROJECT BRIEF

Prepare a project brief

Six short fields are enough to start a feasibility review.

The form saves the enquiry in the Aeronautiq project database. Email and WhatsApp remain optional contact channels. Do not enter sensitive data.